Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_container_app_environment: fix infrastructure_resource_group_name behavior with workload_profile set to Consumption #27502

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jiaweitao001
Copy link
Contributor

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

infrastructure_resource_group_name will be generated by the service even with workload_profile set to Consumption, this will cause unexpected changes in the state file.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #27481

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

…name behavior with consumption workload profile
workload_profile_type = "Consumption"
}

zone_redundancy_enabled = true
Copy link

@J0F3 J0F3 Sep 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When here the intention is to test the configuration with infrastructure_subnet_id and workload_profile only I think zone_redundancy_enabled should be not be part of this test resource as it may have other implications.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

@@ -103,13 +103,9 @@ func (r ContainerAppEnvironmentResource) Arguments() map[string]*pluginsdk.Schem
RequiredWith: []string{"workload_profile"},
ValidateFunc: resourcegroups.ValidateName,
DiffSuppressOnRefresh: true,
DiffSuppressFunc: func(k, oldValue, newValue string, d *pluginsdk.ResourceData) bool { // If this is omitted, and there is a non-consumption profile, then the service generates a value for the required manage resource group.
DiffSuppressFunc: func(k, oldValue, newValue string, d *pluginsdk.ResourceData) bool { // If this is omitted, then the service generates a value for the required manage resource group.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
DiffSuppressFunc: func(k, oldValue, newValue string, d *pluginsdk.ResourceData) bool { // If this is omitted, then the service generates a value for the required manage resource group.
DiffSuppressFunc: func(k, oldValue, newValue string, d *pluginsdk.ResourceData) bool { // If this is omitted and workload_profile is set, then the service generates a value for the required manage resource group.

Maybe?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make sense, will add this line.

return true
}
}
return true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍🏻

@rcskosir rcskosir added the bug label Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

azurerm_container_app_environment with infrastructure_subnet_id set is not idempotent
3 participants