azurerm_container_app_environment: add support for workload_profiles_consumption_only_enabled

[jiaweitao001]

• Consumption workload profile can be attached alone without a dedicated workload profile.

• Test case passed.

=== RUN   TestAccContainerAppEnvironment_withWorkloadProfileComsumptionOnly
=== PAUSE TestAccContainerAppEnvironment_withWorkloadProfileComsumptionOnly
=== CONT  TestAccContainerAppEnvironment_withWorkloadProfileComsumptionOnly
--- PASS: TestAccContainerAppEnvironment_withWorkloadProfileComsumptionOnly (1332.53s)
PASS

resolves #24198, fix #24596

[meizenga]

When can we expect this to be merged?

[sdib]

would be great to have it merged, do you have any ETA ?

[kaganmersin]

@katbyte @jackofallops
Is there any improvement for this PR ? It's about adding really important key feature for Container Apps and many projects using Container Apps have been asking for this support

[jackofallops]

Thanks @jiaweitao001 - As discussed offline, I'm going to close this PR in favour of folding the Consumption support into the workload_profile block directly so there are not 2 schema items attempting to control the same resource property.

Thanks again.

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.