Skip to content

Conversation

graytaylor0
Copy link

Rollback Plan

If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the library.

Changes to Security Controls

Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.

Description

Relations

Closes #0000

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccXXX PKG=ec2

...

… APIs

Signed-off-by: Taylor Gray <tylgry@amazon.com>
@graytaylor0 graytaylor0 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2025 21:56
Copy link
Contributor

Community Guidelines

This comment is added to every new Pull Request to provide quick reference to how the Terraform AWS Provider is maintained. Please review the information below, and thank you for contributing to the community that keeps the provider thriving! 🚀

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this Pull Request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize it.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for additional information on how the maintainers handle prioritization.
  • Please do not leave +1 or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions; they generate extra noise for others following the Pull Request and do not help prioritize the request.

Pull Request Authors

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Our automation has detected the following potential issues with your pull request


❌ Changelog Entry Required (Click to expand)

The proposed change requires a changelog entry. Please see the Changelog Process section of the contributing guide for information on the changelog generation process.

Tip: This check is not triggered for draft pull requests, since the pull request number is not known until the pull request is opened and is required to create a changelog entry. Opening a pull request first as a draft, adding the requisite changelog entry file, and then marking the pull request as ready for review will prevent future warnings.

@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. generators Relates to code generators. service/osis Issues and PRs that pertain to the osis service. size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Sep 19, 2025
type pipelineResourcePolicyResourceModel struct {
framework.WithRegionModel
ID types.String `tfsdk:"id"`
ResourceARN fwtypes.ARN `tfsdk:"resource_arn"`

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is using all capitals the correct Terraform convention? In the API, this is called ResourceArn.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is the same convention used for pipeline (

PipelineARN types.String `tfsdk:"pipeline_arn"`
).

type pipelineEndpointResourceModel struct {
framework.WithRegionModel
ID types.String `tfsdk:"id"`
PipelineARN fwtypes.ARN `tfsdk:"pipeline_arn"`

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these conventions with ARN the correct ones for Terraform? They are different from the AWS APIs themselves.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The same convention is used for pipeline.go

Timeout: timeout,
MinTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
Delay: 30 * time.Second,
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we do anything if we hit CREATE_FAILED?

Copy link
Author

@graytaylor0 graytaylor0 Sep 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that may be handled by terraform automatically since the only valid pending status is CREATING. Looking at other providers they do not do any explicit checks for failed statuses

@justinretzolk justinretzolk added new-resource Introduces a new resource. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
generators Relates to code generators. new-resource Introduces a new resource. service/osis Issues and PRs that pertain to the osis service. size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants