r/aws_route53_resolver_rule enhancement: new argument server_name_indication to target_ip block

[alexbacchin]

Description

This PR adds the argument server_name_indication attribute to the target_ip block. It also adds an additional test for this argument.

Relations

Closes #40121

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol PKG=route53resolver
make: Verifying source code with gofmt...
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go1.23.2 test ./internal/service/route53resolver/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol'  -timeout 360m
2024/11/14 22:10:53 Initializing Terraform AWS Provider...
=== RUN   TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol
=== PAUSE TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol
=== CONT  TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol
--- PASS: TestAccRoute53ResolverRule_forwardMultiProtocol (317.50s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/route53resolver    317.583s

...

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.