feat: HIP-1028 Implement Create and Update calls with metadata

[stoyanov-st]

Description:

!!! NOTE: This PR is squashed version of #15136 due to verification issues !!!

This PR aims to add the implementation for CreateToken and UpdateToken system contract calls with the metadata field described in HIP-1028 included.
Also provided E2E tests for validation of the newly added flows.
The feature is behind a feature flag contracts.systemContract.metadataKeyAndFieldSupport.enabled that is only enable on dev and previewnet envs.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #14591 #15126 #14622 #15237

Notes for reviewer:
! In order to completely support getInfo function response types we need to have the System Contract versioning implemented so that we can expose new functions. Thus some of the calls for getInfo are commented for the current state.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.89888% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.39%. Comparing base (a0cc065) to head (e178715).
Report is 69 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...exec/systemcontracts/hts/update/UpdateDecoder.java	42.00%	26 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...exec/systemcontracts/hts/create/CreateDecoder.java	95.74%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ontracts/hts/create/CreateSyntheticTxnFactory.java	91.66%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...stemcontracts/hts/tokenkey/TokenKeyTranslator.java	75.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...vice/contract/impl/exec/utils/TokenKeyWrapper.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop   #16135      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      58.05%   58.39%   +0.33%     
- Complexity     19765    19847      +82     
=============================================
  Files           2726     2726              
  Lines          99747    99860     +113     
  Branches       10295    10284      -11     
=============================================
+ Hits           57908    58309     +401     
+ Misses         38233    37927     -306     
- Partials        3606     3624      +18     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ode/app/hapi/utils/contracts/ParsingConstants.java	96.82% <ø> (ø)
...a/com/hedera/node/config/data/ContractsConfig.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...pl/exec/processors/CustomMessageCallProcessor.java	86.91% <100.00%> (ø)
...act/impl/exec/systemcontracts/hts/ReturnTypes.java	92.30% <ø> (ø)
...systemcontracts/hts/create/ClassicCreatesCall.java	58.22% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/systemcontracts/hts/create/CreateTranslator.java	100.00% <100.00%> (+62.96%)	⬆️
...c/systemcontracts/hts/update/UpdateTranslator.java	96.00% <100.00%> (+29.33%)	⬆️
...e/contract/impl/exec/utils/TokenCreateWrapper.java	56.41% <100.00%> (+56.41%)	⬆️
...ontracts/hts/create/CreateSyntheticTxnFactory.java	60.29% <91.66%> (+60.29%)	⬆️
...stemcontracts/hts/tokenkey/TokenKeyTranslator.java	88.46% <75.00%> (+31.93%)	⬆️
... and 3 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.35% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 83.71%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (a0cc065)	99564	61377	61.65%
Head commit (e178715)	99677 (+113)	61796 (+419)	62.00% (+0.35%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#16135)	178	149	83.71%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[lukelee-sl]

LGTM

[Neeharika-Sompalli]

I will defer to @lukelee-sl or @tinker-michaelj review on smart contract files. Changes to other files LGTM! Thanks @stoyanov-st