Suggestion: Cite the following papers

[FinAminToastCrunch]

In reference to Ethical Considerations on Pruning, I would suggest citing:

Tran, Cuong, et al. "Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy." Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (2022): 17652-17664.

As it discusses how pruning can harm accuracy with respect to inferencing on certain ethnicities.

In reference to Establishing Criteria for Pruning, I believe these two papers would be relevant to cite for the portions on importance scores as they tie together more recent work concerning gradient flow and neuron magnitude:

J. Rachwan, D. Z ̈ugner, B. Charpentier, S. Geisler, M. Ayle, and
S. G ̈unnemann, “Winning the lottery ahead of time: Efficient early
network pruning,” in International Conference on Machine Learning,
ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (K. Chaudhuri,
S. Jegelka, L. Song, C. Szepesv ́ari, G. Niu, and S. Sabato, eds.),
vol. 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 18293–
18309, PMLR, 2022.

E. S. Lubana and R. P. Dick, “A gradient flow framework for analyzing
network pruning,” CoRR, vol. abs/2009.11839, 2020.

[profvjreddi]

@FinAminToastCrunch The link you shared is not working. Could you update the link so I can take at which part you are referring to here.

[FinAminToastCrunch]

Fixed:

https://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book/contents/optimizations/optimizations.html#legal-and-ethical-considerations

[profvjreddi]

Thanks Fin! Do you think you could issue a PR so that I could review it and merge it in? I will edit it if needed after you issue a PR.

…

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 12:32 PM, Fin Amin ***@***.***> wrote: Fixed: https://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book/contents/optimizations/ optimizations.html#legal-and-ethical-considerations — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#304 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABT6DFCX5CGCGD27HY2FEBLZKV2K7AVCNFSM6AAAAABKGWEZOSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMBZGMZDGOBVGI> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[profvjreddi]

And just as FYI. I typically avoid incorporating overly cutting-edge material into the book. The criterion for inclusion is that the industry must be actively adopting and utilizing the methods discussed. This approach ensures the content remains relevant and avoids delving into an excessive number of rapidly evolving topics. Does that make sense? On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 12:44 PM, Janapa Reddi, Vijay ***@***.***> wrote:

…

Thanks Fin! Do you think you could issue a PR so that I could review it and merge it in? I will edit it if needed after you issue a PR. Vijay Janapa Reddi, Ph. D. | John L. Loeb Associate Professor of Engineering and Applied Sciences | John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences | Science and Engineering Complex (SEC) | 150 Western Ave, Room #5.305 | Boston, MA 02134 | Harvard University | My Website <http://scholar.harvard.edu/vijay-janapa-reddi> | Google Scholar <https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=gy4UVGcAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate> | Edge Computing Lab <https://edge.seas.harvard.edu> | Book Meeting <https://fantastical.app/vjreddi/> | Contact Admin <https://scholar.harvard.edu/vijay-janapa-reddi/contact> | On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 12:32 PM, Fin Amin ***@***.***> wrote: Fixed: https://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book/contents/optimizations/ optimizations.html#legal-and-ethical-considerations — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#304 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABT6DFCX5CGCGD27HY2FEBLZKV2K7AVCNFSM6AAAAABKGWEZOSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMBZGMZDGOBVGI> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[FinAminToastCrunch]

Done!

And yes, makes sense.

[profvjreddi]

Dealt with in issue #306 and PR

[profvjreddi]

Thanks @FinAminToastCrunch I finally got a chance to review the changes and make some tweaks an close it.