Description
Describe the bug
To Reproduce
Run two captures at the same time, one using candump with hardware timestamps :
candump -ta -H can1
The other utilising python-can e.g. logger :
python -m can.logger -c can1
If you then dump the output into a spreadsheet and compare frames, the output is quite different. For example, on a cyclic message on our hardware, I can see the cycle with candump -H
is stable +/- 5 microseconds. With the timestamps from python-can the variance seems to be +/- 900 microseconds.
Expected behavior
The python can docs say :
The timestamp field in a CAN message is a floating point number representing when the message was received since the epoch in seconds. Where possible this will be timestamped in hardware.
So I'd have expected the hardware timestamps to have been enabled as with candump -H
.
Additional context
OS and version: Debian 12 (6.1.112-1)
Python version: 3.11
python-can version: 4.4.2
python-can interface/s (if applicable): Peak PCAN-USB X6
We're using the standard kernel drivers not peak's custom drivers.