Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More aggressively unify duplicate lets #8204

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Apr 28, 2024

Conversation

abadams
Copy link
Member

@abadams abadams commented Apr 19, 2024

The simplifier can also clean up most of these, but it's harder for it
because it has to consider that other mutations may have taken place.
Beefing this up has no impact on lowering times for most apps, but
something pathological was going on for local_laplacian. At 20 pyramid
levels, this speeds up lowering by 1.3x. At 50 pyramid levels it's 2.3x.
At 100 pyramid levels it's 4.1x.

It also slightly reduces binary size.

Deletes a bunch of code and speeds up lowering time of local laplacian
with 20 pyramid levels by ~2.5%
It was O(n) for n facts. This makes it O(log(n))

This was particularly bad for pipelines with lots of inputs or outputs,
because those pipelines have lots of asserts, which make for lots of
facts to substitute in.

Speeds up lowering of local laplacian with 20 pyramid levels (which has
only one input and one output) by 1.09x

Speeds up lowering of the adams 2019 cost model training pipeline (lots
of weight inputs and lots outputs due to derivatives) by 1.5x

Speeds up resnet50 (tons of weight inputs) lowering by 7.3x!
Interval::is_single_point() used to only compare expressions by shallow
equality to see if they are the same Expr object.

However, bounds_of_expr_in_scope is really improved if it uses deep
equality instead, so it has a prepass that goes over the provided scope,
calls equal(min, max) on everything, and fixes up anything where deep
equality is true but shallow equality.

This prepass costs O(n) for n things in scope, regardless of how complex
the expression being analyzed is. So if you ask for the bounds of '4'
say in a context where there are lots of things in the scope, it's
absurdly slow. We were doing this! BoxTouched calls
bounds_of_expr_in_scope lots of times on small index Exprs within the
same very large scope.

It's better to just make Interval::is_single_point() check deep
equality. This speeds up local laplacian lowering by 1.1x, and resnet50
lowering by 1.5x.

There were also places where intervals that were a single point were
diverging due to carelessly written code. E.g. the interval [40*8,
40*8], where both of those 40*8s are the same Mul node, was being
simplified like this:

interval.min = simplify(interval.min);
interval.max = simplify(interval.max);

Not only does this do double the simplification work it should, but it
also caused something that was a single point to diverge into not being
a single point, because the repeated constant-folding creates a new
Expr. With the new is_single_point this matters a lot less, but even so,
I centralized simplification of intervals into a single helper that
doesn't do the pointless double-simplification for single points.

Some of these shallowly-unequal but deeply-equal Intervals were being
created in bounds inference itself after the prepass, which may have
been generating suboptimal bounds. This change should fix that in
addition to the compile-time benefits.

Also added a simplify call in SkipStages because I noticed when it
processed specializations it was creating things like (condition) ||
(!condition).
The simplifier can also clean up most of these, but it's harder for it
because it has to consider that other mutations may have taken place.
Beefing this up has no impact on lowering times for most apps, but
something pathological was going on for local_laplacian. At 20 pyramid
levels, this speeds up lowering by 1.3x. At 50 pyramid levels it's 2.3x.
At 100 pyramid levels it's 4.1x.

It also slightly reduces binary size.
@abadams
Copy link
Member Author

abadams commented Apr 23, 2024

Ready for review

rewrites[op->name] = iter->second;
if (simplified.as<Variable>() ||
simplified.as<IntImm>()) {
// The RHS collapsed to just a Var or a constant, so uses of
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't there be other constant types, like UIntImm, FloatImm, or StringImm, that we care about here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot to address this directly in review, instead of just in the update comment. Basically no. This is at a point in lowering where LetStmts are just bounds inference expressions.

Looking up with an Expr key and deep equality is expensive, so this was
bad.
@abadams
Copy link
Member Author

abadams commented Apr 24, 2024

Better comment pushed. I also fixed that I was doing a double-lookup of the value in the map 'scope' in the case where it wasn't already there.

@abadams
Copy link
Member Author

abadams commented Apr 28, 2024

Just needs an approval

Copy link
Member

@rootjalex rootjalex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@abadams abadams merged commit 8202163 into main Apr 28, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants