Skip to content

Make Generator output names predictable (for RunGen usage) #2194

Open
@steven-johnson

Description

@steven-johnson

Generators that use Output<> can end up with ${SOME_INTEGER} appended to the actual name of the output, due to unique-ifcation of Funcs.

Generators that use build() don't have any way to specify a name for the outputs, and end up with f{SOME_INTEGER} as the output name.

In both cases, a predictable name would be better: in the former case, we should ensure that the output names match the declared name; in the latter case, we should generate a predictable-but-likely-unique name (e.g. of the form "${GENERATORNAME}_output").

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions