Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for array as argument to FenwickTree#new #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2021

Conversation

universato
Copy link
Contributor

@universato universato commented May 24, 2021

  • Tests pass
  • Appropriate changes to README are included in PR

I've made it so that FenweickTree#new can take an array as an argument.

new(int): 292ms
https://atcoder.jp/contests/practice2/submissions/22893243

new(array): 268ms
https://atcoder.jp/contests/practice2/submissions/22895055

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented May 24, 2021

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it! and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@universato
Copy link
Contributor Author

universato commented May 24, 2021

@googlebot I signed it!

Copy link
Owner

@hakatashi hakatashi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thank you for your contribution 🥰

@hakatashi hakatashi merged commit ae371fb into hakatashi:master May 26, 2021
@universato universato deleted the fenwick_tree-array-init branch May 26, 2021 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants