-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Added language detection and revamped github actions so that code rev… #27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…iew happens on a label
| ) | ||
| const pullRequestService = new PullRequestService(octokit) | ||
|
|
||
| if (github.context.eventName === 'pull_request') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the provided git diff, here are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the new import and the changes made to the
CodeReviewServiceinstantiation.
// Import the LanguageDetectionService to detect the programming language of the code
import { LanguageDetectionService } from './services/languageDetectionService'- Consider destructuring the
config()function to import only the necessary variables, making the code more readable and easier to maintain.
import { GITHUB_TOKEN, MODEL_NAME, MODEL_API_KEY } from './config'- It's a good practice to use meaningful variable names. In the following code snippet, consider renaming the variable
_to something more descriptive, likelanguage:
.split(',')
.map(language => language.trim())- Since the
runfunction is getting longer, consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions. For example, you could create a separate function for initializing services:
function initializeServices(model: BaseChatModel): [CodeReviewService, PullRequestService] {
const languageDetectionService = new LanguageDetectionService()
const codeReviewService = new CodeReviewService(model, languageDetectionService)
const pullRequestService = new PullRequestService(octokit)
return [codeReviewService, pullRequestService]
}
// Usage
const [codeReviewService, pullRequestService] = initializeServices(model)Overall, the changes in the git diff look good. Just make sure to keep the code clean and maintainable by following best practices and adding comments where necessary.
| lang: programmingLanguage, | ||
| diff: chunk.content | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the provided git diff, here are some suggestions for improvement:
- Add comments to the code to explain the purpose of the new
LanguageDetectionServiceand its usage in theCodeReviewServiceclass. This will help other developers understand the code more easily.
// LanguageDetectionService is used to detect the programming language of a file
import { LanguageDetectionService } from './languageDetectionService'- It seems that you have removed an empty line after the import statements. It's a good practice to separate import statements from the rest of the code with an empty line for better readability.
import parseDiff from 'parse-diff'
// Add an empty line here
import { LanguageDetectionService } from './languageDetectionService'- In the
codeReviewForandcodeReviewForChunksmethods, you are using theprogrammingLanguagevariable to store the detected language. Consider renaming this variable todetectedLanguagefor better clarity.
const detectedLanguage = this.languageDetectionService.detectLanguage(file.filename)- Add comments to the
codeReviewForandcodeReviewForChunksmethods to explain their purpose and the parameters they accept.
/**
* Perform a code review for the given file and return the review results.
* @param file - The PullRequestFile to review.
* @returns - The review results as a ChainValues object.
*/
async codeReviewFor(file: PullRequestFile): Promise<ChainValues> {
// ...
}
/**
* Perform a code review for each chunk in the given file and return the review results.
* @param file - The PullRequestFile containing the chunks to review.
* @returns - The review results as a ChainValues object.
*/
async codeReviewForChunks(file: PullRequestFile): Promise<ChainValues> {
// ...
}Overall, the changes in the git diff look good. Just make sure to add comments and maintain proper formatting to improve the readability of the code.
| } as const | ||
|
|
||
| type LanguageKey = keyof typeof extensionToLanguageMap | ||
| export type Language = (typeof extensionToLanguageMap)[LanguageKey] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, the code looks good and serves its purpose. However, there are a few improvements that can be made:
-
Use a more descriptive name for the
extensionToLanguageMapconstant. A better name could befileExtensionToLanguageMap. -
Instead of disabling the ESLint rule for filenames, consider renaming the file to match the regex pattern. This will help maintain consistency across the project.
-
The
detectLanguagemethod can be simplified using optional chaining and nullish coalescing.
Here's the updated code with the suggested improvements:
// Rename the file to match the regex pattern, e.g. language-detection.service.ts
export class LanguageDetectionService {
detectLanguage = (filename: string): Language | undefined => {
const extension = this.getFileExtension(filename);
return fileExtensionToLanguageMap[extension as LanguageKey] ?? undefined;
};
private getFileExtension(filename: string): string {
const extension = filename.split('.').pop();
return extension ? extension : '';
}
}
const fileExtensionToLanguageMap = {
// ...
} as const;
type LanguageKey = keyof typeof fileExtensionToLanguageMap;
export type Language = typeof fileExtensionToLanguageMap[LanguageKey];With these changes, your code should be more concise and maintainable.
…iew happens on a label