Refactor AppVeyor Configuration by Removing SONAR_TOKEN

[guibranco]

User description

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

---

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
• Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

---

---

Description

• Removed unnecessary SONAR_TOKEN from the AppVeyor configuration.
• Ensured the dotnet_csproj section is correctly set for patching.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Configuration changes	appveyor.yml Update AppVeyor Configuration for CI                                          appveyor.yml Removed SONAR_TOKEN from the environment variables. Updated the dotnet_csproj section to ensure proper patching. +0/-2

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Streamlined the build process by removing the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable.
  • Enhanced handling of test results and coverage reports in the build process.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The appveyor.yml configuration file has been modified to remove the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable, impacting the SonarQube analysis during builds. The JAVA_HOME and PATH settings have been eliminated from the init section. Changes in the build_script now conditionally append the SonarQube token based on the LOCAL_PR variable. Additionally, the after_build section has been updated to include commands for managing test results and coverage reports, while the deployment section remains mostly unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
appveyor.yml	Removed SONAR_TOKEN; eliminated JAVA_HOME and PATH settings; modified build_script to conditionally append SonarQube token; updated after_build to copy test results and coverage reports.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where we play,
Tokens gone, but we’re okay!
Coverage reports now in sight,
Hopping high with pure delight.
Build scripts dance, a joyful tune,
Underneath the bright, full moon! 🌕

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between caea457 and a82a69f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• appveyor.yml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• appveyor.yml

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and involve the removal of a single environment variable without complex logic.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:56PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:56PM INF 99 commits scanned.
12:56PM INF scan completed in 87.1ms
12:56PM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Replace sensitive token values with a placeholder to improve security Consider removing any sensitive information or tokens from the configuration file to enhance security. appveyor.yml [9-10] CODECLIMATE_TOKEN: - secure: yu+vMzLmIqpgj+jWmo1P38HMz+CA4rekk82GTTUMZDX1rmDsPV5kDngmS6TBSy9QKZgxQnpQyygRUFI3TBqgyphz8QuW09BhhF1727IWJ+I= + secure: <REDACTED> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the need to redact sensitive information, which is crucial for security best practices.	9
	Replace the CODECLIMATE_TOKEN with a placeholder to enhance security Ensure that the remaining secure tokens are stored securely and not hardcoded in the configuration file. appveyor.yml [9-10] CODECLIMATE_TOKEN: - secure: yu+vMzLmIqpgj+jWmo1P38HMz+CA4rekk82GTTUMZDX1rmDsPV5kDngmS6TBSy9QKZgxQnpQyygRUFI3TBqgyphz8QuW09BhhF1727IWJ+I= + secure: <REDACTED> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: While the suggestion is valid and emphasizes security, it is somewhat redundant given the first suggestion, which already addresses the need for redaction.	8

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (caea457)	8	8	100.00%
Head commit (a82a69f)	8 (+0)	8 (+0)	100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#114)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[AppVeyorBot]

✅ Build LatLongNet-SDK-dotnet 2.1.75 completed (commit 5bede16ff6 by @guibranco)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (caea457) to head (a82a69f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #114   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            8         8           
=========================================
  Hits             8         8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.