Enhance link checker report with updated URLs and formatting

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #549

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Enhanced the bancos.json and bancos.md files by updating the URL for Caixa Econômica Federal.
• Improved file formatting by ensuring proper line endings.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

bancos.json Update URL and formatting in bancos.json                                  data/bancos.json Updated URL for Caixa Econômica Federal. Ensured proper formatting by adding a newline at the end of the file. +2/-2      bancos.md Update URL and formatting in bancos.md                                      data/bancos.md Changed URL for Caixa Econômica Federal entry. Adjusted formatting for consistency. +1/-1

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated the URL for "Caixa Econômica Federal" to a simplified format.

• Bug Fixes

  • Corrected the URL format in the bank data entries.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the URLs for bank entries in two files: data/bancos.json and data/bancos.md. The modifications involve removing the "www" subdomain from the URL for "Caixa Econômica Federal," resulting in a simplified URL format. Additionally, a minor formatting issue is noted regarding the absence of a newline at the end of the JSON file.

Changes

File	Change Summary
data/bancos.json	URL updated: "Url": "https://www.caixa.gov.br" → "Url": "https://caixa.gov.br"; minor formatting issue (no newline at end)
data/bancos.md	URL updated: https://www.caixa.gov.br → https://caixa.gov.br

Possibly related issues

• None identified.

Possibly related PRs

• Update bank URLs in bancos.json #532: This PR also involves modifications to the data/bancos.json file, specifically updating URLs for various banking entities, which is directly related to the URL change made in the main PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement, 🔗 link checker

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

In the land of banks where bunnies hop,
A URL change made the old one stop.
No more "www," just a simple way,
To find Caixa's home where savings play.
Hooray for updates, let’s cheer and cheer,
For clearer links that bring us near! 🐰✨

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c1a56c and 2bccc24.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• data/bancos.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv

Files selected for processing (2)

• data/bancos.json (2 hunks)
• data/bancos.md (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• data/bancos.json

Additional context used

Markdownlint

data/bancos.md

61-61: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward, involving URL updates and formatting adjustments in JSON and Markdown files.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[github-actions]

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	462
✅ Successful	361
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	98
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	3

Errors per input

Errors in ./data/bancos.md

• [ERR] https://caixa.gov.br/ | Failed: Too many redirects: error following redirect for url (https://caixa.gov.br/)
• [403] https://www.sicoob.com.br/web/sicoobcreditran/sicoob-creditran | Cached: Error (cached)

Errors in ./CHANGELOG.md

• [429] https://github.com/VGsss | Cached: Error (cached)
  Full Github Actions output

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

4:46AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
4:46AM INF 976 commits scanned.
4:46AM INF scan completed in 2.45s
4:46AM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Standardize date formats to ensure consistency and prevent errors Ensure that the date formats are consistent across all entries, as discrepancies can lead to parsing errors or misinterpretation of the data. data/bancos.md [58-64] +2021-05-05T09:11:12.7113602-03:00 | 2021-05-05T09:11:12.7113681-03:00 - Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Standardizing date formats is important for consistency and preventing errors, and this suggestion addresses a relevant concern in the new data added.	7
	Check for duplicate entries to maintain data integrity Review the addition of the new entry to ensure it does not duplicate existing entries, which could lead to data inconsistency. data/bancos.md [61] -104 | 00360305 | 00.360.305/0001-04 | Caixa Econômica Federal | CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL | RSFN | Caixa Econômica Federal | DRCT | Sim | Sim | Sim | Não | Sim | Sim | Banco folha e Destinatário | Capital de Giro,Cheque Especial,Consignado,Imobiário,Pessoal,Troca de Modalidade,Veículos | https://caixa.gov.br | 2002-04-22 | 2020-11-03 06:30:00 | 2021-05-05T09:11:12.7112717-03:00 | 2024-05-15T16:49:45.7397678+00:00 +104 | 00360305 | 00.360.305/0001-04 | Caixa Econômica Federal | CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL | RSFN | Caixa Econômica Federal | DRCT | Sim | Sim | Sim | Não | Sim | Sim | Banco folha e Destinatário | Capital de Giro,Cheque Especial,Consignado,Imobiário,Pessoal,Troca de Modalidade,Veículos | https://www.caixa.gov.br | 2002-04-22 | 2020-11-03 06:30:00 | 2021-05-05T09:11:12.7112717-03:00 | 2024-05-15T16:49:45.7397678+00:00 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Checking for duplicate entries is crucial for data integrity, but the suggestion does not address any specific issue in the new code added.	6
Possible issue	Validate the new URL entry for correctness and accessibility Consider validating the new URL entry to ensure it is reachable and correctly formatted, as this will enhance the reliability of the data. data/bancos.md [61] -https://caixa.gov.br +https://www.caixa.gov.br Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Validating URLs is important for data reliability; however, the suggestion does not directly relate to the code changes made in the PR.	5
Best practice	Standardize the URL format to include "www" for consistency Ensure that the URL follows a consistent format, especially regarding the use of "www" in the domain, to avoid potential confusion or broken links. data/bancos.json [470] -"Url": "https://caixa.gov.br", +"Url": "https://www.caixa.gov.br", Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: While standardizing the URL format is a good practice, the suggestion to add "www" may not be necessary as both URLs are valid and functional.	4

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud