Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fixing some stacks docs #3887

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

fix: Fixing some stacks docs #3887

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

yhakbar
Copy link
Collaborator

@yhakbar yhakbar commented Feb 13, 2025

Description

Fixes up some stacks docs.

TODOs

Read the Gruntwork contribution guidelines.

  • Update the docs.
  • Run the relevant tests successfully, including pre-commit checks.
  • Ensure any 3rd party code adheres with our license policy or delete this line if its not applicable.
  • Include release notes. If this PR is backward incompatible, include a migration guide.

Release Notes (draft)

Updated stacks docs.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new CLI command that lets users retrieve aggregated outputs from their infrastructure stacks with options for unit filtering and various output formats.
  • Documentation

    • Updated experimental mode guidelines with enhanced criteria for stack stabilization, including support for recursive stacks, improved integration testing across workflows, parallel execution compatibility, and robust error handling.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
terragrunt-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 13, 2025 11:55pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates Terragrunt documentation by introducing a new CLI command stack output for retrieving aggregated and unit-specific outputs with customizable formats. It also refines the experimental documentation for the stacks feature by adding additional stabilization criteria such as support for stack "values", recursive stacks, integration testing for recursive handling, compatibility with parallelism flags, and improved error handling across nested stacks.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/_docs/.../02-cli-options.md Added documentation for the new stack output command, including usage examples, unit-specific filtering, and output formatting options (default, json, raw).
docs/_docs/.../06-experiments.md Updated experimental criteria for the stacks feature to include support for stack "values", recursive stacks, integration testing, parallelism, and error recovery.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant C as Terragrunt CLI
    participant S as Terragrunt Stack Manager

    U->>C: Execute "terragrunt stack output [unit] --format [option]"
    C->>S: Request aggregated or unit-specific outputs
    S-->>C: Return outputs in requested format
    C->>U: Display outputs
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Stack: clean #3871: Involves renaming the output command to stack output and the addition of the stack clean command, making it directly relevant to these documentation updates.

Suggested Reviewers

  • denis256
  • levkohimins

Poem

In the realm of code so bright,
A new command now takes flight.
stack output leads the way,
Guiding outputs without delay.
Stacks refined with criteria clear,
Terragrunt sings—let's give a cheer! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/_docs/04_reference/06-experiments.md (1)

115-116: Consider adding descriptions for the new criteria.

The new criteria "Add support for stack 'values'" and "Add support for recursive stacks" would benefit from brief descriptions explaining what these features entail and their intended use cases. This would help users understand what to expect from these features once they're stable.

Apply this diff to add descriptions:

-  - [ ] Add support for stack "values".
-  - [ ] Add support for recursive stacks.
+  - [ ] Add support for stack "values" - Allow defining and sharing common values across multiple units in a stack.
+  - [ ] Add support for recursive stacks - Enable nesting of stacks within stacks for hierarchical organization of infrastructure.
docs/_docs/04_reference/02-cli-options.md (1)

371-429: Consider adding error handling information.

The documentation for the stack output command is comprehensive, but it would be helpful to include information about how the command handles errors, such as:

  • What happens when a unit's output cannot be retrieved
  • How to handle missing outputs
  • Error messages users might encounter

Add a new section about error handling:

| `raw`     | Outputs key-value pairs in a compact, JSON-like format. When accessing lists or complex structures, data must be retrieved using an index-based approach. | `--format=raw`     |

+### Error Handling
+
+The `stack output` command handles errors in the following ways:
+- If a unit's output cannot be retrieved, the command will display an error message and continue with the remaining units
+- When accessing a non-existent output, the command will return an error
+- For missing or undefined outputs, the command will indicate which outputs are unavailable
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c49ea4f and cd3bec8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/_docs/04_reference/02-cli-options.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/_docs/04_reference/06-experiments.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: unessential
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/_docs/04_reference/06-experiments.md (1)

117-119: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive stabilization criteria.

The new criteria for integration testing, parallelism compatibility, and error handling are well-defined and cover important aspects of stack functionality.

docs/_docs/04_reference/02-cli-options.md (2)

430-465: LGTM! Clear and helpful JSON format example.

The JSON format example is well-structured and provides a realistic representation of the output, making it easy for users to understand what to expect.


489-496: LGTM! Concise raw format example.

The raw format example effectively demonstrates the simplicity of accessing simple values.

@yhakbar yhakbar merged commit 2b61ebf into main Feb 14, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@yhakbar yhakbar deleted the fix/fixing-some-stacks-docs branch February 14, 2025 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants