Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: name resolver start() should not throw #9589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2022
Merged

doc: name resolver start() should not throw #9589

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2022

Conversation

YifeiZhuang
Copy link
Contributor

fix #9541

@YifeiZhuang YifeiZhuang requested a review from ejona86 October 5, 2022 00:20
@YifeiZhuang YifeiZhuang merged commit cff8bd8 into grpc:master Oct 5, 2022
@YifeiZhuang YifeiZhuang deleted the nameresolver-failure-handling branch October 5, 2022 23:22
larry-safran pushed a commit to larry-safran/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
@YifeiZhuang @larry-safran
doc: name resolver start() should not throw (grpc#9589)
d933a13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@ejona86 ejona86 ejona86 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NameResolver should explicitly state that methods executed in SynchronizationContext must not throw
2 participants
@YifeiZhuang @ejona86