Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added new github processor #46

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023
Merged

added new github processor #46

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

dan-mm
Copy link
Contributor

@dan-mm dan-mm commented Nov 16, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Old Energy EstimationEco-CI Output: |Label|🖥 avg. CPU utilization [%]|🔋 Total Energy [Joules]|🔌 avg. Power [Watts]|Duration [Seconds]| |---|---|---|---|---| |Total Run|6.59955|26.8806|1.92004|23| |Measurement #1|6.1125|12.4761|1.7823|8| |Sleep #2|9.09875|14.4045|2.05779|9|

📈 Energy graph:

 
 3.79 ┤        ╭╮
 3.59 ┤        ││
 3.39 ┤        ││
 3.18 ┤        ││
 2.98 ┤        ││
 2.78 ┤        ││
 2.58 ┤        ││
 2.38 ┤        ││
 2.17 ┤        ││
 1.97 ┤        ││
 1.77 ┼────────╯╰───
       Watts over time
 ```</details>

@ArneTR
Copy link
Member

ArneTR commented Nov 16, 2023

vhost ratio is a thread based coefficient. The way I read it it should be 2/128, no?

You see two CPUs (aka Threads) in lscpu or /proc/cpuinfo ? Spec Sheet says 128 Threads? If both is yes, then it is 2/128

Copy link

Eco-CI Output:

Label 🖥 avg. CPU utilization [%] 🔋 Total Energy [Joules] 🔌 avg. Power [Watts] Duration [Seconds]
Total Run 6.45913 24.7645 1.7689 24
Measurement #1 6.37625 12.3823 1.7689 9
Sleep #2 5.97625 12.3823 1.7689 9

📈 Energy graph:

 
 2.00 ┼─────────────
       Watts over time

@dan-mm dan-mm merged commit 4aa956e into main Nov 17, 2023
3 checks passed
@ribalba ribalba deleted the new-github-processor branch November 20, 2023 18:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants