Fix formal spec of lone anonymous operation #156
Conversation
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla - and if you have received this in error or have any questions, please drop us a line at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
|
Thanks for highlighting this! I'm not sure your proposed change is correct though. It seems to read that only one operation of any kind may exist within a document, but this rule seeks to only ensure that is the case if the one query is anonymous. |
|
Good point. I was thinking of the spec in isolation rather than globally. |
Fix formal spec of lone anonymous operation
|
Awesome, thanks! |
Lone means lone. Set of ALL operations must be set of one.