Skip to content

Conversation

@jdolle
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdolle jdolle commented Jan 6, 2026

Background

If a proposal's schema does not build then it throws an uncaught error, causing the entire page to error up to the error boundary.

Description

This catches the buildSchema error to avoid breaking the entire page.

I encountered this on load when the changed schema is fetched before the latest schema, so I added a loading check prior to the patch/build logic, but also added a try/catch to buildSchema which might be excessive and unnecessary. (The checkschema mutation should always validate the schema so no invalid schema should get through.)

@jdolle jdolle requested a review from n1ru4l January 6, 2026 21:46
@jdolle jdolle self-assigned this Jan 6, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jdolle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the application's stability and user experience by addressing a critical issue where an invalid schema within a proposal would cause the entire page to become unresponsive. The changes introduce a robust error handling mechanism that catches schema build failures, preventing crashes and allowing the application to manage and potentially display these errors gracefully. Additionally, the update expands the system's ability to normalize and track a broader range of schema change types, laying groundwork for more detailed schema insights.

Highlights

  • Robust Error Handling for Invalid Schemas: Implemented a try...catch block around the buildSchema function calls to gracefully handle cases where a proposal's schema definition is invalid, preventing the entire page from crashing.
  • Schema Build Error Tracking: Introduced a buildError field within the ServiceProposalDetails type to store and expose any errors encountered during the schema construction process, allowing for better debugging and user feedback.
  • Expanded Schema Change Type Normalization: Updated the urql client's cache normalization configuration to include a wide array of new SchemaChangeMeta, SchemaCheckMeta, and various DirectiveUsage types, enhancing the handling of schema-related data in the UI.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

🚀 Snapshot Release (alpha)

The latest changes of this PR are available as alpha on npm (based on the declared changesets):

Package Version Info
@graphql-hive/apollo 0.46.0-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
@graphql-hive/cli 0.57.0-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
@graphql-hive/core 0.19.0-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
@graphql-hive/envelop 0.40.1-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
@graphql-hive/yoga 0.46.1-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
hive 8.14.0-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
hive-apollo-router-plugin 2.3.6-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
hive-console-sdk-rs 0.2.3-alpha-20260106214739-c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

📚 Storybook Deployment

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://pr-7467.hive-storybook.pages.dev

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

💻 Website Preview

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://pr-7467.hive-landing-page.pages.dev

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

🐋 This PR was built and pushed to the following Docker images:

Targets: build

Platforms: linux/amd64

Image Tag: c701de4e76a3f2c3f370149646a825070785569a

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to prevent page crashes caused by invalid schemas in proposals by gracefully handling errors with a try-catch block around buildSchema. However, the current implementation introduces a client-side Denial of Service vulnerability, as buildSchema and patchSchema are executed on the main thread with potentially malicious user-provided data, which can lead to browser unresponsiveness. It is recommended to address this DoS vulnerability.

Comment on lines +275 to +295
if (beforeSchema) {
afterSchema = patchSchema(beforeSchema, allChanges, {
onError(error, change) {
if (error instanceof NoopError) {
ignoredChanges.push({ change, error });
}
conflictingChanges.push({ change, error });
return errors.looseErrorHandler(error, change);
},
});
} else {
try {
afterSchema = buildSchema(proposalVersion.schemaSDL, {
assumeValid: true,
assumeValidSDL: true,
});
} catch (e: unknown) {
console.error(e);
buildError = e as Error;
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

security-medium medium

The buildSchema and patchSchema functions, which are called with user-provided schema data, are vulnerable to a client-side Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Maliciously crafted schema data (e.g., deep recursion or large changes) can cause excessive CPU/memory consumption, blocking the main thread and crashing the browser tab. Although a try-catch block is present for buildSchema, it only prevents an uncaught error from crashing the page, not the DoS itself. To mitigate this, it is strongly recommended to run buildSchema and patchSchema inside a Web Worker to offload these potentially long-running tasks from the main thread. Additionally, within the error handling, consider making the type assertion for e safer by checking if e is an instance of Error before accessing its properties, as e as Error can lead to unexpected behavior if a non-Error value is thrown.

@jdolle jdolle merged commit f00a518 into main Jan 7, 2026
26 checks passed
@jdolle jdolle deleted the fix-invalid-proposal-schema-err branch January 7, 2026 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants