Open
Description
openedon Nov 23, 2023
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendExa[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3, 4] in 'wght=100.0'
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels