-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 698
Fix(Bug): Automatic_function_calling config persists across requests, causing UNEXPECTED_TOOL_CALL when tools=None #1841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Muhammad-Rebaal
wants to merge
7
commits into
googleapis:main
Choose a base branch
from
Muhammad-Rebaal:bug_fix_auto_function_calling
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cce258d
Fix(Bug):automatic_function_calling config persists across requests, …
Muhammad-Rebaal 1cd1c9d
Removed development comments added just to remember
Muhammad-Rebaal b119ae7
Merge branch 'main' into bug_fix_auto_function_calling
Muhammad-Rebaal a09dbdf
Merge branch 'main' into bug_fix_auto_function_calling
BenjaminKazemi 3074ed2
Merge branch 'main' into bug_fix_auto_function_calling
Muhammad-Rebaal f7fa88a
test: Update AFC tests to include tools and correct expected outcomes
Muhammad-Rebaal 6c261fe
Merge branch 'main' into bug_fix_auto_function_calling
Muhammad-Rebaal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please change the test cases as much as possible instead of changing the assertion. By changing only the assertion, the tests are not validating the actual test case. E.g. in this test case, pass in a tool and keep the assertion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback! I've updated the test cases as suggested.
Instead of changing the assertions, I've added tools parameter to the three failing tests:
test_afc_enable_unset_max_1,test_afc_enable_unset_max_1_0,test_afc_enable_true_max_unsetThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! In addition to that would you mind adding an example code that reproduce the bug? AFC logic may seem simple in the first glance but there are corner cases. Would be idea if you could add an example to regenerate the issue or refer me to an existing one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My pleasure , Here's the minimal that can reproduce the error mentioned by @npkanaka :
Although, as you said there can be corner cases, so kindly let me know what is up to you. I'd be happy to implement that under your mentorship.