chore(deps): update googleapis/code-suggester action to v5

[renovate-bot]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
googleapis/code-suggester	action	major	v4 -> v5

---

Release Notes

googleapis/code-suggester (googleapis/code-suggester)

v5

Compare Source

Features

• support adding labels to PRs (#​173) (df55616)

Bug Fixes

• deps: update dependency @​types/yargs to v16 (#​168) (6cc6657)

1.8.2 (2020-12-08)

Bug Fixes

• add package-lock.json to fix Docker build (#​161) (0d5ecf1)

1.8.1 (2020-11-11)

Bug Fixes

• deps: update dependency diff to v5 (#​155) (b923ec4)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @renovate-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request updates the googleapis/code-suggester GitHub Action from version v4 to v5 in the .github/workflows/codegen.yml file. This action is used in the codegen workflow, which generates code for the Google API PHP client services.

Highlights

• Action Update: The primary change is updating the googleapis/code-suggester action to the latest major version, v5.
• Workflow Integration: The updated action is used within the codegen workflow to suggest code improvements.

Changelog

• .github/workflows/codegen.yml
  • Updated googleapis/code-suggester action from v4 to v5 on line 61.
  • Updated googleapis/code-suggester action from v4 to v5 on line 104.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

A version bump, a simple change,
To keep our workflow in a better range.
From v4 to v5 it goes,
Improving code, as everyone knows.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This PR updates the googleapis/code-suggester action to v5. The change appears straightforward, involving a version update in the workflow files. No specific style guide was provided, so I'm assuming the project follows general best practices for YAML files.

Summary of Findings

Merge Readiness

The pull request appears to be a simple version update and should be safe to merge after verification that the new version of the action doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.