Skip to content

Clarification on (external) contribution policy #1384

@ridcl

Description

@ridcl

README tells that contributions are welcome, but in practice I see some obstacles for it. For example:

  • My PR with Qwen3-VL implementation has been submitted 1.5 months ago, but so far even CI/CD workflow has not been approved.
  • Similar PR for multimodal support for Gemma 3 took 6 months to merge.
  • For the past 3 weeks, all merged PRs come either from copybara-service, or from Google employees.
  • Even though Tunix runs perfectly well on GPU, the development setup for it doesn't exist (40+ failing tests, strict dependency on libtpu, etc.)

I totally understand that reviewing external contributions may not be aligned with the company goals at the moment, but can you help me understand what is the best way to extend Tunix ecosystem:

  1. Committing code to this repo as a single source of truth, or
  2. Spinning up a new independent repository with all the extensions?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

type:supportFurther information is requested

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions