Skip to content

Conversation

@osv-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@osv-robot osv-robot commented Jan 12, 2026

This updates osv-scalibr to google/osv-scalibr@98eab4f

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.69%. Comparing base (e74812a) to head (fe355ab).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2461      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.71%   67.69%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         172      172              
  Lines       13336    13333       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         9030     9026       -4     
+ Misses       3592     3591       -1     
- Partials      714      716       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@osv-robot osv-robot force-pushed the bot/update-scalibr branch 4 times, most recently from feba45c to 861ce1a Compare January 15, 2026 19:01
@G-Rath G-Rath self-assigned this Jan 16, 2026
@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

G-Rath commented Jan 16, 2026

This'll unblock #2465 too

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

G-Rath commented Jan 16, 2026

Pretty sure I need to get this landed before the end of day, otherwise the bot will force push away my commits 😅

@G-Rath G-Rath force-pushed the bot/update-scalibr branch from 5a8157f to fe355ab Compare January 16, 2026 01:19
@cuixq cuixq merged commit 96c91b0 into main Jan 16, 2026
17 checks passed
@cuixq cuixq deleted the bot/update-scalibr branch January 16, 2026 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants