Skip to content

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented May 19, 2025

We've already addressed the violations of this in #1772, but could not enable the rule at the time as it was mistakenly omitted from the schema used by the action to valid the linter config - now though golangci/golangci-lint#5692 has been released and we've upgraded, that is no longer an issue 🎉

@G-Rath

This comment was marked as resolved.

@G-Rath G-Rath force-pushed the linting/enable-rule branch 2 times, most recently from f179c98 to bf11bb1 Compare May 27, 2025 00:22
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.28%. Comparing base (a5a8634) to head (871a044).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1868   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.28%   65.28%           
=======================================
  Files         164      164           
  Lines       15868    15868           
=======================================
  Hits        10359    10359           
  Misses       4845     4845           
  Partials      664      664           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@G-Rath G-Rath force-pushed the linting/enable-rule branch from bf11bb1 to 871a044 Compare May 27, 2025 00:40
@G-Rath G-Rath marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2025 00:40
@G-Rath G-Rath requested review from another-rex, cuixq and hogo6002 May 27, 2025 00:40
@another-rex another-rex merged commit 70074a7 into google:main May 27, 2025
15 checks passed
@another-rex another-rex deleted the linting/enable-rule branch May 27, 2025 01:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants