Skip to content

旧字体・異体字表記の単語の登録要望について #1052

Answered by hiroyuki-komatsu
tats-u asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

First of all, we appreciate the reports from our contributors, which provide valuable insights from various perspectives.

However, as you mentioned, we need to prioritize requests to strike a balance between usability and coverage. Therefore, it's possible that some requests may not be addressed until we find that optimal balance. The implementation effort required and the potential impact on other conversion cases will also be factors in our decision-making.

Thank you for reminding us about the issues surrounding variation characters. We are aware of them, particularly the IVS issue you highlighted.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@tats-u
Comment options

Answer selected by tats-u
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants