Skip to content

feat: add support for required query parameters #452

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

li3p
Copy link

@li3p li3p commented May 29, 2025

feat: add support for required query parameters based on field behavior annotations

  • Add isFieldRequired() method to check for REQUIRED field behavior annotation
  • Update _buildQueryParamsV3() to respect field requirements from protobuf annotations
  • Replace hardcoded Required: false with dynamic isRequired based on field annotations
  • Improve OpenAPI spec accuracy by properly reflecting field requirements in query parameters

…or annotations

- Add isFieldRequired() method to check for REQUIRED field behavior annotation
- Update _buildQueryParamsV3() to respect field requirements from protobuf annotations
- Replace hardcoded Required: false with dynamic isRequired based on field annotations
- Improve OpenAPI spec accuracy by properly reflecting field requirements in query parameters
@li3p li3p requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2025 01:56
Copy link

google-cla bot commented May 29, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants