Skip to content

Remove deprecated top-level IR fields (flat items array & top_level_item_ids) from the C++ IR struct.#1307

Open
copybara-service[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test_941103191
Open

Remove deprecated top-level IR fields (flat items array & top_level_item_ids) from the C++ IR struct.#1307
copybara-service[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test_941103191

Conversation

@copybara-service

@copybara-service copybara-service Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Remove deprecated top-level IR fields (flat items array & top_level_item_ids) from the C++ IR struct.

Following removal of top_level_item_ids from the Rust IR in the parent CL, this change removes the top_level_item_ids field from the IR::ToJson() serialization, and moves it from the C++ IR to an internal field on the Clang Invocation.

@google-cla

google-cla Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@copybara-service copybara-service Bot changed the title Deprecate use of the flat items array & *_item_ids from the rs_bindings_from_cc frontend. Remove deprecated top-level IR fields (flat items array & top_level_item_ids) from the C++ IR struct. Jul 1, 2026
@copybara-service copybara-service Bot force-pushed the test_941103191 branch 2 times, most recently from f8034e8 to 30da9de Compare July 2, 2026 20:31
…tem_ids) from the C++ IR struct.

Following removal of top_level_item_ids from the Rust IR in the parent CL, this change removes the top_level_item_ids field from the IR::ToJson() serialization, and moves it from the C++ IR to an internal field on the Clang `Invocation`.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 941103191
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants