Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2025. It is now read-only.

Set @Sample retention to Runtime#23

Merged
marcelpinto merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sample-runtime
Mar 2, 2023
Merged

Set @Sample retention to Runtime#23
marcelpinto merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sample-runtime

Conversation

@marcelpinto
Copy link
Contributor

To enable possible use-cases to search for samples in the binary or perform some sort of reflection at runtime we are changing the retention to RUNTIME.

To enable possible use-cases to search for samples in the binary or perform some sort of reflection at runtime we are changing the retention to RUNTIME.
@marcelpinto marcelpinto requested review from yaraki and yrezgui March 1, 2023 09:01
yrezgui
yrezgui previously requested changes Mar 1, 2023
Copy link

@yrezgui yrezgui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should you update the ProGuard file to make sure we're not losing information when compressing the output?

@marcelpinto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should you update the ProGuard file to make sure we're not losing information when compressing the output?

Since this is purely for debug use-cases there is no need to keep them when proguarded.

@marcelpinto marcelpinto dismissed yrezgui’s stale review March 2, 2023 08:26

As mentioned, for the use case it's okay if proguard strips it out

@marcelpinto marcelpinto merged commit aba1613 into main Mar 2, 2023
@marcelpinto marcelpinto deleted the sample-runtime branch March 2, 2023 08:26
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants