Skip to content

int16 support #781

@EelcoHoogendoorn

Description

@EelcoHoogendoorn

Looking at the code, it appears as if int16 isnt currently supported.

From my currently very supoerficial understanding, it seems like a straightforward extension of all the logic performed on int8...

But then again the fact that its not there implies the authors of this package know something about the complexity of it that I dont?

Is this on the roadmap? And are there any foreseeable problems with it?

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions