Skip to content

Conversation

@guillaumeblaquiere
Copy link
Contributor

In relation with #2416

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @guillaumeblaquiere, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new API capability that enables the system to generate and store memory from existing user sessions. This enhancement provides a direct mechanism to persist session data, which is crucial for maintaining context and improving user experience in subsequent interactions.

Highlights

  • New API Endpoint: A new POST endpoint "/apps/{app_name}/users/{user_id}/sessions/{session_id}/add_to_memory" has been introduced in src/google/adk/cli/adk_web_server.py.
  • Session Memory Generation: This endpoint allows for a specific session to be retrieved and then added to the system's memory service, facilitating the generation of memory from existing sessions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@adk-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

adk-bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Response from ADK Triaging Agent

Hello @guillaumeblaquiere, thank you for creating this PR!

Could you please include a testing plan section in your PR to talk about how you will test this new endpoint? This will save time for PR review.

This information will help reviewers to review your PR more efficiently. Thanks!

@adk-bot adk-bot added bot triaged services [Component] This issue is related to runtime services, e.g. sessions, memory, artifacts, etc labels Sep 10, 2025
@adk-bot adk-bot requested a review from DeanChensj September 10, 2025 11:21
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new endpoint to generate memory from a session. My review identifies a critical issue where a non-existent session is not handled, which would lead to a server error. Additionally, the new endpoint function has a non-descriptive name. I've provided a code suggestion to address these points by adding proper error handling and renaming the function for clarity.

@guillaumeblaquiere
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new endpoint /apps/{app_name}/users/{user_id}/sessions/{session_id}/add_to_memory to add a session's events to the memory service. The implementation is straightforward, but I've suggested a few improvements to enhance code quality and adhere to best practices for API development. Specifically, I've recommended adding a proper docstring, a return type hint, removing a redundant comment, and using a more appropriate HTTP status code for the response.

@GWeale GWeale self-requested a review September 10, 2025 17:28
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeanChensj DeanChensj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@DeanChensj
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you fix the failing tests?

@guillaumeblaquiere
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you fix the failing tests?

Should be OK. I also added a test for my new endpoint. I had to change the mock type for the memory service.
I let you review these changes (both recommended by Gemini Code Assist)

And sorry for the delay, I'm CET timezone based (Europe/Paris)

@DeanChensj
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you fix the style check using autoformat.sh?

@guillaumeblaquiere
Copy link
Contributor Author

ou fix the style check using autoformat.

Done. Thanks for you patience

Copy link
Collaborator

@DeanChensj DeanChensj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@DeanChensj DeanChensj added the ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google label Sep 11, 2025
@DeanChensj DeanChensj added ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google and removed ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google labels Sep 11, 2025
@DeanChensj DeanChensj removed the ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google label Sep 12, 2025
@DeanChensj DeanChensj added the ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google label Sep 18, 2025
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
Merge #2900

In relation with #2416

COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#2900 from guillaumeblaquiere:add-session-to-memory 0507de4
PiperOrigin-RevId: 808658162
@DeanChensj
Copy link
Collaborator

Merged in 2595824

@DeanChensj DeanChensj closed this Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready to pull [Status] This PR is ready to be importing back to Google services [Component] This issue is related to runtime services, e.g. sessions, memory, artifacts, etc

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants