[Fleet Insight] System Healthy Protocol: Goal Currently Satisfied

[jules-fleet]

Objective

Fleet Status: Goal Currently Satisfied

I performed a Phase 0 Verification of the existing issues and current codebase state.

My objective was to triage all open issues in google-labs-code/stitch-sdk and determine their actionability, root causes, priorities, and deduplication potential.
I have reviewed all the open issues listed in the Historical Context.
There are exactly 0 Open Issues requiring triage that are not already tracked or handled by recent PRs and closed issues.

Specifically:

• [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: project.screens() returns empty after generate()] #150 is an insight indicating "Triage Evaluation: project.screens() returns empty after generate()".
• project.screens() returns empty after generate() until project is opened in web UI #149 has been addressed by generating insight [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: project.screens() returns empty after generate()] #150.
• [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: get_screen returns incomplete screen data] #140 is an insight indicating "Triage Evaluation: get_screen returns incomplete screen data".
• get_screen returns incomplete screen data — missing theme, designMd, screenMetadata #138 has been addressed by generating insight [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: get_screen returns incomplete screen data] #140.
• feat: Image input support for edit_screens / new review_screen tool #130 has been addressed by generating insight [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: feat: Image input support for edit_screens / new review_screen tool] #133.
• feat: Collaboration API tools (comments, chat history) for agentic workflows #129 has been addressed by generating insight [Fleet Insight] [Triage Evaluation: feat: Collaboration API tools for agentic workflows] #132.
• callTool does not retry on transient network errors (socket closed during concurrent requests) #114 has been addressed by PR fix: retry callTool on transient network errors + code quality fixes #117.

Following the mandatory constraints:

Only create signals for work that does NOT already have an open issue or recent PR.
When in doubt, skip it. It is better to miss a real gap than to create a duplicate that wastes engineering time.

Since there are no open, actionable issues requiring assessment or execution that are not already covered, I am gracefully exiting by emitting this status report without generating duplicate execution issues. The system is fully satisfied and all necessary tasks are either completed or in flight.

Code-Level Diagnosis

Code path: N/A
Mechanism: The active issues were reviewed and determined to be non-actionable insights or already handled by active PRs.
Root cause: All explicitly defined core workflows and capabilities are fully mapped to recent or currently tracked tasks.

Current Implementation

// The active task board comprehensively covers all identified architectural gaps.

Proposed Implementation

Files to modify: None.

Integration (Before -> After)

// No changes required. The system is healthy and goals are currently satisfied.

Test Scenarios

1. N/A

Target Files

• N/A

Boundary Rules

Restrict your modifications exclusively to the files listed in the Target Files section. Ensure your source changes are entirely backward-compatible if unowned tests outside your boundary fail. Retain all existing file names and locations outside your explicitly declared target list.

---

Fleet Context

• Source: jules:session:13713548963527251485
• Link: https://jules.google.com/session/13713548963527251485