Skip to content

feat: Add support for remote config file #2136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

alexandrevilain
Copy link

@alexandrevilain alexandrevilain commented Jul 29, 2021

Enforcing the same lint configuration for many projects and making updates for it can become a bit time consuming.
This is why I purpose you to add support for remote config file in golangci-lint. It allows teams to maintain only one global configuration file for all their projects.

I'll be happy to discuss with you if the implementation does not match your coding style/rules.

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Jul 29, 2021

Hey, thank you for opening your first Pull Request !

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 29, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ldez ldez added blocked Need's direct action from maintainer enhancement New feature or improvement labels Jul 29, 2021
@ldez ldez self-requested a review July 29, 2021 10:05
@ldez ldez changed the title Feat: Add support for remote config file feat: Add support for remote config file Jul 29, 2021
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jul 29, 2021

Hello,

I would like to suggest opening an issue to discuss the meaning of this feature (not the technical part).

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 18, 2021

I will close this PR according to #2137 (comment)

@ldez ldez closed this Sep 18, 2021
@ldez ldez added the declined label Sep 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked Need's direct action from maintainer declined enhancement New feature or improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants