Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/containers/libpod: GHSA-9h63-7qf6-mv6r #641

Closed
julieqiu opened this issue Aug 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. NeedsTriage

Comments

@julieqiu
Copy link
Member

julieqiu commented Aug 1, 2022

In GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-9h63-7qf6-mv6r, there is a vulnerability in the following Go packages or modules:

Unit Fixed Vulnerable Ranges
github.com/containers/libpod 1.7.0 < 1.7.0

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

packages:
  - package: github.com/containers/libpod
    versions:
      - fixed: 1.7.0
description: A flaw was found in podman before 1.7.0. File permissions for non-root
    users running in a privileged container are not correctly checked. This flaw can
    be abused by a low-privileged user inside the container to access any other file
    in the container, even if owned by the root user inside the container. It does
    not allow to directly escape the container, though being a privileged container
    means that a lot of security features are disabled when running the container.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity
    as well as system availability.
published: 2021-05-18T18:33:12Z
last_modified: 2021-05-18T18:33:12Z
cves:
  - CVE-2021-20188
ghsas:
  - GHSA-9h63-7qf6-mv6r
links:
    context:
      - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9h63-7qf6-mv6r

@zpavlinovic zpavlinovic removed their assignment Aug 15, 2022
@julieqiu julieqiu assigned zpavlinovic and unassigned neild Aug 22, 2022
@zpavlinovic zpavlinovic added the excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. label Aug 22, 2022
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592770 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 50 reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/607222 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 20 reports (20)

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2024
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0609.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0611.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0612.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0615.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0616.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0617.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0618.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0620.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0622.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0623.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0625.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0626.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0630.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0631.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0632.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0634.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0636.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0638.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0640.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0641.yaml

Updates #609
Updates #611
Updates #612
Updates #615
Updates #616
Updates #617
Updates #618
Updates #620
Updates #622
Updates #623
Updates #625
Updates #626
Updates #630
Updates #631
Updates #632
Updates #634
Updates #636
Updates #638
Updates #640
Updates #641

Change-Id: I9fc909832a7e4eb1d23e5eee482674e307e3ee5c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vulndb/+/607222
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. NeedsTriage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants