Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/answerdev/answer: GHSA-65v8-6pvw-jwvq #1716

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-65v8-6pvw-jwvq, there is a vulnerability in the following Go packages or modules:

Unit Fixed Vulnerable Ranges
github.com/answerdev/answer 1.0.8 < 1.0.8

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
  - module: github.com/answerdev/answer
    versions:
      - fixed: 1.0.8
    packages:
      - package: github.com/answerdev/answer
summary: Answer vulnerable to Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
description: answerdev/answer is an open-source knowledge-based community software.
    Answer prior to 1.0.8 does not strip EXIF geolocation data from user-uploaded
    logos. As a result, anyone can get sensitive information like a user's device
    ID, geolocation, system information, system version, etc.
cves:
  - CVE-2023-1975
ghsas:
  - GHSA-65v8-6pvw-jwvq
references:
  - web: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1975
  - fix: https://github.com/answerdev/answer/commit/ac3f2f047ee00b4edaea7530e570ab67ff87cd6a
  - web: https://huntr.dev/bounties/829cab7a-4ed7-465c-aa96-29f4f73dbfff
  - advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-65v8-6pvw-jwvq

@timothy-king timothy-king self-assigned this Apr 11, 2023
@timothy-king timothy-king added the excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. label Apr 11, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/483975 mentions this issue: data/excluded: batch add GO-2023-1719, GO-2023-1718, GO-2023-1716

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592760 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 75 reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/606785 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 20 reports (5)

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2024
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1700.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1701.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1707.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1708.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1716.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1718.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1719.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1721.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1723.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1730.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1735.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1738.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1747.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1754.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1758.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1761.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1763.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1764.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1768.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2023-1774.yaml

Updates #1700
Updates #1701
Updates #1707
Updates #1708
Updates #1716
Updates #1718
Updates #1719
Updates #1721
Updates #1723
Updates #1730
Updates #1735
Updates #1738
Updates #1747
Updates #1754
Updates #1758
Updates #1761
Updates #1763
Updates #1764
Updates #1768
Updates #1774

Change-Id: I3fc567427d68e095cc62ea48dc9b284b2414a372
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vulndb/+/606785
Auto-Submit: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants