Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(middleware/session): fix data-race with sync.Pool #3051

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 30, 2024

Conversation

sixcolors
Copy link
Member

@sixcolors sixcolors commented Jun 29, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes focus on enhancing the thread safety of session management within the middleware/session package. Specifically, multiple functions in session.go and store.go now implement mutex locks to ensure that session properties and data are safely accessed and modified in concurrent environments.

Changes

File Change Summary
middleware/session/session.go Added locks in releaseSession, changed locking in Destroy, and added locks in Reset and Save methods.
middleware/session/store.go Introduced locking mechanisms in Get method for setting session properties and decoding session data.

Poem

In the world of sessions swift and keen,
Locks now guard the unseen,
Making threads safe and sound,
Errors and crashes no longer found.
🐇 CodeRabbit's joy, lock-bound delight,
Sessions now safer, in code’s embrace tight.
✨🔒


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.97%. Comparing base (83731ce) to head (feabb26).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3051      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.06%   82.97%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        8260     8266       +6     
==========================================
- Hits         6861     6859       -2     
- Misses       1071     1076       +5     
- Partials      328      331       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.97% <100.00%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sixcolors sixcolors changed the title Add session mutex lock for thread safety fix(middleware/session): fix data-race with sync.Pool Jun 29, 2024
The changes include updating the comments to provide clearer explanations of the function's behavior.
@sixcolors sixcolors marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2024 23:37
@sixcolors sixcolors requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2024 23:37
@sixcolors sixcolors requested review from gaby, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team June 29, 2024 23:37
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83731ce and feabb26.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • middleware/session/session.go (6 hunks)
  • middleware/session/store.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
middleware/session/store.go (1)

81-83: LGTM!

The addition of mutex locks ensures thread safety when setting session properties and decoding session data.

However, ensure that all function calls to Store.Get are properly tested for thread safety.

middleware/session/session.go (4)

111-112: LGTM!

Switching from mu.Lock() to mu.RLock() for read-only access is appropriate for the operations performed in this method.

However, ensure that all function calls to Session.Destroy are properly tested for thread safety.

Verification successful

The Destroy method is properly tested for thread safety.

The Test_Session_Destroy function includes parallel sub-tests, which indicate that the Destroy method is tested for concurrent access scenarios.

  • middleware/session/session_test.go:429-447: Sub-test for destroying session from a cookie.
  • middleware/session/session_test.go:449-483: Sub-test for destroying session from a header.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Session.Destroy` are properly tested for thread safety.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper usage and testing for thread safety.
rg --type go $'Session.Destroy'

Length of output: 179



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the Test_Session_Destroy function from middleware/session/session_test.go
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func Test_Session_Destroy($_) {
  $$$
}' middleware/session/session_test.go

Length of output: 3791


147-149: LGTM!

The addition of mutex locks ensures thread safety when resetting session properties.

However, ensure that all function calls to Session.Reset are properly tested for thread safety.

Verification successful

LGTM!

The addition of mutex locks ensures thread safety when resetting session properties. The Test_Session_Reset function runs in parallel, indicating that the Reset method is properly tested for thread safety.

  • middleware/session/session_test.go:
    • The Test_Session_Reset function uses t.Parallel() to test the Reset method concurrently.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Session.Reset` are properly tested for thread safety.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper usage and testing for thread safety.
rg --type go $'Session.Reset'

Length of output: 240



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract and display the contents of the Test_Session_Reset function to verify thread safety testing.

# Extract the Test_Session_Reset function from the test file.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func Test_Session_Reset($_) {
  $$$
}' middleware/session/session_test.go

Length of output: 4624


Line range hint 45-56: LGTM!

The addition of mutex locks ensures thread safety when modifying session properties.

However, ensure that all function calls to releaseSession are properly tested for thread safety.

Verification successful

Thread Safety Verified

The call to releaseSession is properly synchronized with mutex locks, ensuring thread safety when modifying session properties.

  • The mutex lock is acquired before the call to releaseSession.
  • The mutex is unlocked after the call to releaseSession.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `releaseSession` are properly tested for thread safety.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper usage and testing for thread safety.
rg --type go $'releaseSession'

Length of output: 142



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the context around the call to `releaseSession` to ensure thread safety.

# Test: Search for the usage of `releaseSession` within `middleware/session/session.go` and display surrounding lines.
rg -C 5 'releaseSession' middleware/session/session.go

Length of output: 373



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the function where `releaseSession` is called to ensure thread safety.

# Test: Search for the function definition that includes the call to `releaseSession` within `middleware/session/session.go` and display surrounding lines.
rg -A 10 -B 10 'releaseSession' middleware/session/session.go

Length of output: 819


215-216: LGTM!

The addition of mutex locks ensures thread safety when setting the expiration.

However, ensure that all function calls to Session.SetExpiry are properly tested for thread safety.

Verification successful

Thread Safety Verified for SetExpiry Method

The SetExpiry method in the Session struct correctly uses a mutex to ensure thread safety. The mutex mu is locked before setting the expiration and unlocked immediately after.

  • File: middleware/session/session.go
  • Lines: 215-216

No further action is required.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Session.SetExpiry` are properly tested for thread safety.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper usage and testing for thread safety.
rg --type go $'Session.SetExpiry'

Length of output: 32



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Session.SetExpiry` and proper usage of the mutex `mu` in the `Session` struct.

# Search for the `SetExpiry` function usage in Go files
rg --type go 'SetExpiry'

# Search for the `Session` struct definition and its methods
rg --type go 'type Session struct'

# Search for methods of the `Session` struct to check mutex usage
rg --type go 'func (s \*Session)' 

Length of output: 384



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the `session_test.go` file for tests related to `SetExpiry` and the `session.go` file for the `Session` struct and its methods.

# Display the `SetExpiry` function definition and relevant parts of `session.go`
rg --type go --context 10 'func (s *Session) SetExpiry(exp time.Duration)' middleware/session/session.go

# Display the `Session` struct definition and its methods in `session.go`
rg --type go --context 10 'type Session struct' middleware/session/session.go

# Display the tests related to `SetExpiry` in `session_test.go`
rg --type go --context 10 'SetExpiry' middleware/session/session_test.go

Length of output: 1274



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the `SetExpiry` function definition in `session.go` to confirm the proper usage of the mutex `mu`.

# Display the `SetExpiry` function definition in `session.go`
rg --type go --context 20 'func (s *Session) SetExpiry(exp time.Duration)' middleware/session/session.go

Length of output: 106



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the entire `session.go` file to manually inspect the `SetExpiry` function definition and mutex usage.

# Display the entire `session.go` file
cat middleware/session/session.go

Length of output: 7295

middleware/session/session.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Jun 30, 2024
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 0400af6 into gofiber:main Jun 30, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants