Skip to content

Conversation

@lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Jan 9, 2019

Will fix #1357

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Jan 9, 2019
@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2019
5 tasks
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 9, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@530c2b8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #5671   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   37.77%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      323           
  Lines             ?    47595           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    17977           
  Misses            ?    27029           
  Partials          ?     2589
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
models/ssh_key.go 40.23% <0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 530c2b8...8c770b9. Read the comment docs.

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 9, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@zeripath zeripath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh dear, I think I've looked at this code before and wondered why it didn't need to rewrite the public keys! Turns out it did!!

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 9, 2019
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Jan 9, 2019

@zeripath I just take a look and found the problem. Sorry to post a PR before you! :)

@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

zeripath commented Jan 9, 2019

No probs, as I said, I saw it and ignored it. That'll teach me! I think I may just need to be more suspicious.

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 9, 2019
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 0b84b5e into go-gitea:master Jan 9, 2019
lunny added a commit to lunny/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2019
lunny added a commit to lunny/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2019
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/fix_del_deploy_key_not_reuse branch January 10, 2019 04:15
@lunny lunny added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Jan 10, 2019
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deploy Key can't be deleted then reused as Profile key

6 participants