Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve /api/v1/repos/issues/search by just getting repo ids #15179

Conversation

zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

@zeripath zeripath commented Mar 27, 2021

/api/v1/repos/issues/search is a highly inefficient search which is unfortunately
the basis for our dependency searching algorithm. In particular it currently loads
all of the repositories and their owners and their primary coding language all of
which is immediately thrown away.

This PR makes one simple change - just get the IDs.

Related #14560
Related #12827

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton art27@cantab.net

/api/v1/repos/issues/search is a highly inefficient search which is unfortunately
the basis for our dependency searching algorithm. In particular it currently loads
all of the repositories and their owners and their primary coding language all of
which is immediately thrown away.

This PR makes one simple change - just get the IDs.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
@zeripath zeripath added backport/v1.14 type/bug performance/speed performance issues with slow downs labels Mar 27, 2021
zeripath and others added 4 commits March 27, 2021 18:48
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 27, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Mar 27, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 29, 2021
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor Author

make lg-tm work

@zeripath zeripath merged commit c1ca4a8 into go-gitea:master Mar 29, 2021
@zeripath zeripath deleted the improve-12827-speed-up-issues-search-on-large-servers branch March 29, 2021 17:12
zeripath added a commit to zeripath/gitea that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2021
…a#15179)

Backport go-gitea#15179

/api/v1/repos/issues/search is a highly inefficient search which is unfortunately
the basis for our dependency searching algorithm. In particular it currently loads
all of the repositories and their owners and their primary coding language all of
which is immediately thrown away.

This PR makes one simple change - just get the IDs.

Related go-gitea#14560
Related go-gitea#12827

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
6543 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
…#15192)

Backport #15179

/api/v1/repos/issues/search is a highly inefficient search which is unfortunately
the basis for our dependency searching algorithm. In particular it currently loads
all of the repositories and their owners and their primary coding language all of
which is immediately thrown away.

This PR makes one simple change - just get the IDs.

Related #14560
Related #12827

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
@6543 6543 added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Apr 7, 2021
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 13, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. performance/speed performance issues with slow downs type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants