Skip to content

Improve push update options #10105

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 2, 2020
Merged

Improve push update options #10105

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 2, 2020

Conversation

@lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Feb 2, 2020

As title.

@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Feb 2, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Feb 2, 2020
@guillep2k
Copy link
Member

guillep2k commented Feb 2, 2020

Tests require updating.

zeripath
zeripath reviewed Feb 2, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@zeripath zeripath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would guess that the functions should also be exported rather than private

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 2, 2020
6543
6543 reviewed Feb 2, 2020
View reviewed changes
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Feb 2, 2020

@zeripath I have exported all the functions. @6543 maybe another package structs? But I think it's not this PR.

zeripath
zeripath reviewed Feb 2, 2020
View reviewed changes
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Feb 2, 2020

@zeripath I have exported all the functions. @6543 maybe another package structs? But I think it's not this PR.

Hmm OK

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 2, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #10105 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10105      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.48%   43.48%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         568      568              
  Lines       79112    79113       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        34404    34406       +2     
  Misses      40461    40461              
+ Partials     4247     4246       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/setting/setting.go 44.07% <0%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
models/unit.go 37.03% <0%> (-2.47%) ⬇️
modules/log/event.go 64.61% <0%> (-1.03%) ⬇️
routers/repo/view.go 39.13% <0%> (-0.87%) ⬇️
services/pull/check.go 56.64% <0%> (+2.09%) ⬆️
services/pull/temp_repo.go 37.6% <0%> (+5.98%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fdd8cbe...dc20594. Read the comment docs.

@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Feb 2, 2020
@lafriks lafriks added the skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features. label Feb 2, 2020
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit bf1970d into go-gitea:master Feb 2, 2020
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/refactor_push_update branch February 3, 2020 00:25
lunny
lunny commented Mar 8, 2020
View reviewed changes
modules/repofiles/update.go
}
var commits = &repo_module.PushCommits{}
if strings.HasPrefix(opts.RefFullName, git.TagPrefix) {
if opts.IsNewTag() {
Copy link
Member Author

@lunny lunny Mar 8, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This introduced a bug. It should be opts.IsTag(). #10663 will resolve the problem.

@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2020
Merged
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@6543 6543 6543 left review comments

@lafriks lafriks lafriks approved these changes

+3 more reviewers

@zeripath zeripath zeripath approved these changes

@adelowo adelowo adelowo approved these changes

@guillep2k guillep2k guillep2k approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.12.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@lunny @guillep2k @6543 @codecov-io @lafriks @zeripath @adelowo @techknowlogick @GiteaBot