Skip to content

Conversation

@come-maiz
Copy link

The word Stream is confusing. It has many meanings, and it's not clear that it means more verbose than verbose. In addition to that, using a numerical value allows future runners and reporters to have a mode that's even more verbose than Stream.

The first commit doesn't change the RunConf type, that's public. It is changed in the second commit.

Requires #71.

Leo Arias added 3 commits January 27, 2016 13:24
If the runner needs the Stream value from the config, it should not get
it from the reporter. It is better to keep a copy of the value in the
runner itself to make the communication between runner and reporter only
one-direction.
@niemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

This is a public API on a very stable package. We can't break people's code unless it's a critical issue.

@niemeyer niemeyer closed this Jan 27, 2016
@come-maiz
Copy link
Author

That's why I split it in two commits, so we could discuss about it. I was thinking that it might be good to start working on v2. But anyway... I proposed only the first commit in #73.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants