-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong apk repository in arm64v8/alpine:edge #375
Comments
I think I understand what you mean. @ncopa is there any chance we might eventually have minirootfs variants for |
I think we should make minirootfs variants for |
Confirm the bug
|
I can confirm it too, also impacting |
+1 |
Filer PR but looks there's no rootfs images for edge... |
Builds are now only generated from upstream minirootfs taballs. The release and update scripts have been refactored and moved to https://githib.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine This commit also include update of all supported images: - edge (20190228 snapshot) - v3.9.2 - v3.8.4 - v3.7.3 - v3.6.5 This commit also introduces v3.9 armv7 image and remove unsupported branches v3.5 and older. fixes at least the following issues: - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#495 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#471 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#463 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#460 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#455 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#430 (security) - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#375
Builds are now only generated from upstream minirootfs taballs. The release and update scripts have been refactored and moved to https://github.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine This commit also include update of all supported images: - edge (20190228 snapshot) - v3.9.2 - v3.8.4 - v3.7.3 - v3.6.5 This commit also introduces v3.9 armv7 image and remove unsupported branches v3.5 and older. fixes at least the following issues: - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#495 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#471 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#463 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#460 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#455 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#430 (security) - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#375
Builds are now only generated from upstream minirootfs taballs. The release and update scripts have been refactored and moved to https://github.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine This commit also include update of all supported images: - edge (20190228 snapshot) - v3.9.2 - v3.8.4 - v3.7.3 - v3.6.5 This commit also introduces v3.9 armv7 image and remove unsupported branches v3.5 and older. fixes at least the following issues: - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#495 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#471 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#463 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#460 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#455 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#430 (security) - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#375
Builds are now only generated from upstream minirootfs taballs. The release and update scripts have been refactored and moved to https://github.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine This commit also include update of all supported images: - edge (20190228 snapshot) - v3.9.2 - v3.8.4 - v3.7.3 - v3.6.5 This commit also introduces v3.9 armv7 image and remove unsupported branches v3.5 and older. fixes at least the following issues: - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#495 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#471 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#463 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#460 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#455 - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#430 (security) - gliderlabs/docker-alpine#375
this is fixed with docker-library/official-images#5516 Sorry for taking so long time. |
I verified the image which was build (and supplied on docker hub) after the merge request #374. It looks good, at least it boots correctly.
There is another issue with the rootfs in the docker image for raspberry arm64v8/alpine:edge.
CDN do not really provide a complete edge rootfs. We utilize the latest, atm 3.7, in the image then there are the wrong package repositories (still 3.7 instead of edge). You can find it at the file /etc/apk/repositories.
The following hack in the Dockerfile will do the trick
But imo, its not very convenient/error-prone to fiddle always around with the version number. Isn't there a better place or even better couldn't we do the build like in library-edge/x86_64.
On the other hand edge is rolling so in fact the built docker image is most of the time outdated and require a update.
Drop me your opinion @andyshinn and I will try to provide u a patch again.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: