Skip to content

Conversation

jianyunli
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Owner

@glgh glgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line 180 - this has something to do with unit conversion, using either 10000 or 17000 is fine but results in different cc6 value. Vissim default cc6 = 11.44, the original paper uses cc6 = 6.00. 11.44/17000 roughly equals to 6.00/10000. I think it's consistent here.

Line 183. Again both Vissim and the original paper are correct. Check out the default value: in Vissim: cc8=3.5, cc9=1.5, and we use cc8 - cc9; in original paper cc8=2.0, cc9=1.5, so it's already taken into account.

@glgh
Copy link
Owner

glgh commented May 5, 2017

Actually, I just saw the notes you mentioned. Let me double check.

@jianyunli
Copy link
Author

OK, agree with cc6, but cc9 need pre-processed to be a negative value (negative slope), so that line 267 is correct,
at speed 0 - cc8
at speed 80 - cc9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants