Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

open func support "utf-8" #641

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

nooperpudd
Copy link

Support some Chinese name branches like origin/feature/测试.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 13, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #641 into master will decrease coverage by 0.34%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #641      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   92.95%   92.6%   -0.35%     
=========================================
  Files          61      61              
  Lines       10065   10067       +2     
=========================================
- Hits         9356    9323      -33     
- Misses        709     744      +35
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
git/repo/fun.py 92.59% <100%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
git/refs/symbolic.py 96.45% <100%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
git/compat.py 52.14% <0%> (-11.05%) ⬇️
git/test/test_git.py 97.57% <0%> (-1.22%) ⬇️
git/objects/tree.py 58.47% <0%> (-1.17%) ⬇️
git/test/test_fun.py 97.88% <0%> (-1.06%) ⬇️
git/config.py 91.77% <0%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
git/refs/log.py 93.07% <0%> (-0.77%) ⬇️
git/cmd.py 82.75% <0%> (-0.65%) ⬇️
git/diff.py 98.66% <0%> (-0.45%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7f657f...ac17e0b. Read the comment docs.

@Byron
Copy link
Member

Byron commented Sep 28, 2017

@nooperpudd My apologies for the late reply! Unfortunately I merged plenty of PRs in the wrong order, which is probably the reason yours is conflicting right now. As I would really like to see it merged, maybe you find the time to have another look.
I promise to be fast merging it once the tests on travis pass again.
Thank you so much for your consideration!

@nooperpudd
Copy link
Author

@Byron ok, I will fix the problem.

@Byron
Copy link
Member

Byron commented Nov 19, 2017

@nooperpudd As always, sorry for getting back to this so late. I have had a look at travis, and besides possibly unrelated failure, one is clearly attributed to codecs working slightly differently in Python > 2.7: https://travis-ci.org/gitpython-developers/GitPython/jobs/293061325#L2480.
Could you have a look again? Thanks a lot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants