Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 31, 2026

Plan: Fix Round Robin Scheme Prompt Syntax

  • Update .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md to change cache: to cache-memory:
  • Update pkg/cli/templates/create-agentic-workflow.md to change cache: to cache-memory:
  • Update the scheme implementation guidance to let the authoring agent decide the data format
  • Verify changes compile correctly
  • Run final validation with make agent-finish

Changes Made

Updated the round-robin processing pattern documentation in both workflow template files:

  1. Changed syntax: cache:cache-memory: true

    • Removed the incorrect nested structure with enabled and keys
    • Now uses the correct MCP server syntax for persistent memory storage
  2. Updated implementation guidance:

    • Changed step 2 to: "Read from cache-memory to determine what was processed last (the authoring agent should decide the data format and update the scheme to implement it)"
    • Changed step 5 to: "Update cache-memory before finishing with the current item state"
    • Removed specific examples like cache_get and cache_set to give agents flexibility in implementation

This aligns with the correct cache-memory: tool syntax documented in github-agentic-workflows.md.

Original prompt

Fix the round robin scheme prompt in create-agentic-workflow.md to use correct syntax.

cache -> cache-memory
the authoring agent should decide the data format and update scheme to implement the scheme


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2026 17:53
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit ba904f2 into main Jan 31, 2026
1 check passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the copilot/fix-round-robin-scheme-syntax branch January 31, 2026 17:53
Copilot AI requested a review from pelikhan January 31, 2026 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants