Skip to content

Fixes output of wrong input variable in reusable #16283

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2022
Merged

Fixes output of wrong input variable in reusable #16283

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

SpraxDev
Copy link
Contributor

@SpraxDev SpraxDev commented Mar 15, 2022

github.event.inputs.tag is never set but .tags is.
I changed the output text from singular to plural and changed the used input variable to the correct one

Why:

Closes #16282

What's being changed:

I changed the job's output to use the correct input variable and reworded it from singular to plural.

Check off the following:

  • I have reviewed my changes in staging (look for "Automatically generated comment" and click Modified to view your latest changes).
  • For content changes, I have completed the self-review checklist.

Writer impact (This section is for GitHub staff members only):

  • This pull request impacts the contribution experience
    • I have added the 'writer impact' label
    • I have added a description and/or a video demo of the changes below (e.g. a "before and after video")

`github.event.inputs.tag` is never set but `.tags` is.
I changed the output text from singular to plural and changed the used input variable to the correct one
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Mar 15, 2022

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Mar 15, 2022
@ramyaparimi ramyaparimi added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Mar 16, 2022
@ramyaparimi
Copy link
Contributor

@SpraxDev
Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review ⚡

@ramyaparimi ramyaparimi added the needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert label Mar 25, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@lucascosti lucascosti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks heaps for this fix, @SpraxDev! 🚀

We're currently in the middle of a deployment freeze, but I will mark this as ready to be merged when the freeze is over.

@lucascosti lucascosti added ready to merge This pull request is ready to merge and removed waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert labels Mar 28, 2022
@ramyaparimi ramyaparimi enabled auto-merge March 30, 2022 15:21
@ramyaparimi ramyaparimi merged commit a371d46 into github:main Mar 30, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. If you're looking for your next contribution, check out our help wanted issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team ready to merge This pull request is ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Example workflow does not yield the expected output (workflow-dispatch-inputs.md)
3 participants