Skip to content

Conversation

@kaspersv
Copy link
Contributor

This PR extends the ql/inline-overlay-caller query with support for overlay[caller?] annotations.

@kaspersv kaspersv force-pushed the kaspersv/ql4ql-overlay-caller-q branch 4 times, most recently from 8e30984 to 49db3aa Compare June 24, 2025 09:51
@kaspersv kaspersv force-pushed the kaspersv/ql4ql-overlay-caller-q branch from 49db3aa to e1fc138 Compare June 24, 2025 09:58
@kaspersv kaspersv requested a review from ginsbach June 24, 2025 10:27
@kaspersv kaspersv marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 10:28
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 24, 2025 10:28
@kaspersv kaspersv requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2025 10:28
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for the overlay[caller?] annotation in the inline-overlay-caller query, updating both the implementation and test expectations.

  • Extend the query to recognize and skip overlay[caller?] annotations
  • Update the warning message to suggest overlay[caller?] alongside overlay[caller]
  • Define the new CallerQArg and OverlayCallerQ classes in the AST

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
ql/ql/test/queries/overlay/InlineOverlayCaller/Test.qll Added a test predicate with overlay[caller?]
ql/ql/test/queries/overlay/InlineOverlayCaller/InlineOverlayCaller.expected Updated expected warning to mention overlay[caller?]
ql/ql/src/queries/overlay/InlineOverlayCaller.ql Excluded OverlayCallerQ annotations and updated the suggestion text
ql/ql/src/codeql_ql/ast/Ast.qll Introduced CallerQArg and OverlayCallerQ classes

@kaspersv kaspersv merged commit c380c5f into main Jun 24, 2025
12 checks passed
@kaspersv kaspersv deleted the kaspersv/ql4ql-overlay-caller-q branch June 24, 2025 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants