Skip to content

Data flow: Fix a bad join order #14047

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hvitved
Copy link
Contributor

@hvitved hvitved commented Aug 24, 2023

Before

Evaluated relational algebra for predicate DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowThroughIntoCall#6#ffffff@0ea4e2mt with tuple counts:
           1065437   ~0%    {4} r1 = SCAN project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::fwdFlow#9#fffffffff#2 OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2
        1158508760   ~0%    {6} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowIntoCallApa#6#ffffff_14023#join_rhs ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4

                            {6} r3 = SELECT r2 ON In.5 != false
        1158470345   ~4%    {6} r4 = SCAN r3 OUTPUT In.4, In.1, In.2, In.0, In.3, In.5

                            {6} r5 = SELECT r2 ON In.5 = false
             38415   ~0%    {5} r6 = SCAN r5 OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.1, In.3, In.4
                 4   ~0%    {5} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH DataFlowImplCommon#f7de413b::MakeImplCommon#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Cached::TApproxFrontNil#f ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3
                 4   ~0%    {6} r8 = SCAN r7 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, false

        1158470349   ~4%    {6} r9 = r4 UNION r8
             44065   ~3%    {6} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::returnFlowsThrough#8#ffffffff ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
                            return r10

After

Evaluated relational algebra for predicate DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowThroughIntoCall#6#ffffff@979c54q9 with tuple counts:
         11095   ~0%    {4} r1 = SCAN project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::returnFlowsThrough#8#ffffffff OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2
        470154   ~1%    {8} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowIntoCallApa#6#ffffff_20134#join_rhs ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4

                        {8} r3 = SELECT r2 ON In.6 != false
        470152   ~0%    {8} r4 = SCAN r3 OUTPUT In.5, In.2, In.3, In.7, In.0, In.1, In.4, In.6

                        {8} r5 = SELECT r2 ON In.6 = false
             2   ~0%    {7} r6 = SCAN r5 OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.5, In.7
             0   ~0%    {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH DataFlowImplCommon#f7de413b::MakeImplCommon#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Cached::TApproxFrontNil#f ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
             0   ~0%    {8} r8 = SCAN r7 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, false

        470152   ~0%    {8} r9 = r4 UNION r8
         44065   ~3%    {6} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::fwdFlow#9#fffffffff#2 ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
                        return r10

Before
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowThroughIntoCall#6#ffffff@0ea4e2mt with tuple counts:
           1065437   ~0%    {4} r1 = SCAN project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::fwdFlow#9#fffffffff#2 OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2
        1158508760   ~0%    {6} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowIntoCallApa#6#ffffff_14023#join_rhs ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4

                            {6} r3 = SELECT r2 ON In.5 != false
        1158470345   ~4%    {6} r4 = SCAN r3 OUTPUT In.4, In.1, In.2, In.0, In.3, In.5

                            {6} r5 = SELECT r2 ON In.5 = false
             38415   ~0%    {5} r6 = SCAN r5 OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.1, In.3, In.4
                 4   ~0%    {5} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH DataFlowImplCommon#f7de413b::MakeImplCommon#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Cached::TApproxFrontNil#f ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3
                 4   ~0%    {6} r8 = SCAN r7 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, false

        1158470349   ~4%    {6} r9 = r4 UNION r8
             44065   ~3%    {6} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::returnFlowsThrough#8#ffffffff ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
                            return r10
```

After
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowThroughIntoCall#6#ffffff@979c54q9 with tuple counts:
         11095   ~0%    {4} r1 = SCAN project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::returnFlowsThrough#8#ffffffff OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2
        470154   ~1%    {8} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::flowIntoCallApa#6#ffffff_20134#join_rhs ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4

                        {8} r3 = SELECT r2 ON In.6 != false
        470152   ~0%    {8} r4 = SCAN r3 OUTPUT In.5, In.2, In.3, In.7, In.0, In.1, In.4, In.6

                        {8} r5 = SELECT r2 ON In.6 = false
             2   ~0%    {7} r6 = SCAN r5 OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.5, In.7
             0   ~0%    {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH DataFlowImplCommon#f7de413b::MakeImplCommon#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Cached::TApproxFrontNil#f ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
             0   ~0%    {8} r8 = SCAN r7 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, false

        470152   ~0%    {8} r9 = r4 UNION r8
         44065   ~3%    {6} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH project#DataFlowImpl#248dabc3::MakeImpl#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Impl#DataFlow#167ac380::DataFlowMake#DataFlowImplSpecific#21008cd7::RubyDataFlow#::Global#XSS#e59174e9::OrmTracking::Config#::C#::MkStage#Stage2#::Stage#Stage3Param#::fwdFlow#9#fffffffff#2 ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
                        return r10
```
@hvitved hvitved added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Aug 25, 2023
@hvitved hvitved marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2023 06:35
@hvitved hvitved requested a review from aschackmull August 25, 2023 06:39
@hvitved
Copy link
Contributor Author

hvitved commented Aug 25, 2023

Needed for #11725.

Copy link
Contributor

@aschackmull aschackmull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm surprised to see this as such a bad join-order. This must mean that we have a large fanout from arg to argAp in fwdFlow (and/or possibly to argT). But the fix seems fairly innocent.

@hvitved hvitved merged commit 42fd9f0 into github:main Aug 25, 2023
@hvitved hvitved deleted the dataflow/join-fix branch August 25, 2023 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants