Octokit Retries #181
Merged
Octokit Retries #181
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Simply re-ordering the imports (8356933) led to quite a big PR diff 🙃 |
jasonmacgowan
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Octokit Retries
This pull request implements retry logic to GitHub API calls via the
@octokit/plugin-retrylibraryAll requests through the octokit client will now use default retry logic. The only exception is the
createOrUpdateFileContents()method as it will likely return a404if the branch is not created yet through eventual consistency. This allows us to wait for up to 10 seconds, which at this point the branch should exist.resolves: #180