Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(slices): Make consumers "slice-aware" #3259
feat(slices): Make consumers "slice-aware" #3259
Changes from 37 commits
aac106c
8088d3d
36c14be
18340a0
56223ae
ce6e3e2
0870749
7b49b9d
ec2e7ba
5e6f762
91def84
0e149d8
9213a6d
4cbec25
7e76304
bbc4fc6
1c3bf3d
5fa3189
cbce8b5
0c414b5
771ee37
ce12536
1de82db
9d020a4
b81609b
5e91265
27e70cf
470a365
5375282
9510a50
fd44db3
ecf06df
7ba8ce6
8c8425d
b8c25f5
e9d52f6
db7e972
9f06bba
2fe8679
dde5c5a
9003367
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personal preference, I'd rather you just left all these names.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue with leaving the names is the potential confusion between (Snuba)
Topic
and an (Arroyo)Topic
. If both areTopic
(how it was originally), it can become confusing to work with the code in future iterations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the issue is the other topic (SnubaTopic) is being imported here but that should never be the case. It should always be accessed via the stream loader and KafkaTopicSpec mechanism to ensure that topic resolving is done correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense. I no longer have those imports. Shall I change
ArroyoTopic
back toTopic
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. That seems good to me. It feels a little bit more consistent with what the other files do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bumping this. Can you please revert the change?