-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Client Reports feature #1556
Conversation
CI is much slower than expected, so can't rely on timing part of the test. The test still proves that the expected values are achieved.
Parallel.ForEach is a better choice than async/await for this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking great. One concern about value tuples on netfx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This already goes in the right direction. I don't see any issues from a concept point of view right now. Thanks for doing this 🎉. I added a few comments.
Note, I'll need to refactor this to use the transport afterall. Doing it in the background worker will get in the way of the changes I'm getting ready to submit to support extensibility (for Unity WebGL). I have a plan... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking better every day 👍
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1556 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.34% 84.21% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 219 224 +5
Lines 7423 7520 +97
Branches 1417 1427 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 6261 6333 +72
- Misses 735 759 +24
- Partials 427 428 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Implement Client Reports. Resolves #1455
Ready for review!