Skip to content

feat(sdks): Add beforeSendTransaction to filtering page #5838

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

lobsterkatie
Copy link
Member

@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie commented Nov 22, 2022

Note: Given the on-going work on the Filtering page, I'm splitting this off of the main PR adding beforeSendTransaction to the docs. I'll update this as the filtering page work progresses, but leaving it in draft state for now. (If you're curious about what this PR will actually do in and of itself, look at the second commit below. Not expecting any reviews at this point, though.)


This adds the new beforeSendTransaction option to the Filtering page.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 22, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
sentry-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 22, 2022 at 5:55PM (UTC)

lobsterkatie added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This adds the new `beforeSendTransaction` option to the docs, both on the options page and alongside `beforeSend` in many places in the text. Because you can't selectively turn certain phrases on and off for different platforms, I tried to indicate where I could that it's not universally supported. (Right now, I believe JS is in fact the only platform to support it, though I expect that to change in the near future.) It also does a tiny bit of wordsmithing of the text around the additions, courtesy of @lizokm and @imatwawana.

Note that the one spot where updates haven't been done in this PR is the text of the Filtering page, as it's being worked on separately in #5804. Once the changes there are done, #5838 will add `beforeSendTransaction`.
@cleptric
Copy link
Member

cleptric commented Dec 9, 2022

@lobsterkatie What's the status here?

@lobsterkatie
Copy link
Member Author

@lobsterkatie What's the status here?

It's currently waiting on #5804, which is actually done save dealing with language-specific snippets and hint properties (see #5811). I'm about to go on sabbatical, so cc @lizokm @imatwawana to help decide what the best path forward is. I think with not too much work, we could get the wordsmithing part of #5804 merged (assuming they seem like good changes), which would then unblock this PR, and chase the snippets/properties separately. Thoughts?

@cleptric cleptric self-assigned this Dec 12, 2022
@imatwawana
Copy link
Contributor

#5804

I think that's fine. I'll review #5804 today so we can unstick that.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2023

This pull request has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it.

But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you label it Status: Backlog or Status: In Progress, I will leave it alone ... forever!


"A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀

@getsantry
Copy link
Contributor

getsantry bot commented Oct 18, 2023

This issue has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it.

But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you remove the label Waiting for: Community, I will leave it alone ... forever!


"A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀

@getsantry getsantry bot added the Stale label Oct 18, 2023
@cleptric cleptric closed this Oct 18, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 3, 2023
@stephanie-anderson stephanie-anderson deleted the kmclb-add-beforeSendTransaction-to-filtering-page branch February 23, 2024 10:28
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants